THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI will hold examination for direct recruitment against 14 vacancies to Delhi Higher Judicial Service on Sunday, the 06th April,2014-Last Date 06.02.2014 13/11/2013: While renewing the term of the appointment of the existing incumbents the State Government is required to consider their past performance and conduct in the light of the recommendations made by the District Judges and the District Magistrates. Therefore, the High Court could not have issued a Mandamus for renewal of the term of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and other similarly situated persons and thereby frustrated the provisions of LR Manual and Section 24 Cr.P.C .- SUPREME COURT. 12 Nov. 2013- Registration of FIR by police in cognizable offence is must and action must be taken against officials for not lodging a case on the complaint filed in such offences.- Supreme Court.(PTI) 09/11/2013: Supreme Court stayed Gauhati High Court order that declared CBI as unconstitutional. 06-11-2013 -"while we decline to hold and declare that the DSPE Act, 1946, is not a valid piece of legislation, we do hold that the CBI is neither an organ nor a part of the DSPE and the CBI cannot be treated as a ‘police force’ constituted under the DSPE Act, 1946"-GUWAHATI HIGH COURT
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JUDGEMENTS


Print Judgement
 
Judgement:
                   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 613 OF 2011

(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CRL.)NO.8858 OF 2010)

AJAY KUMAR PRASAD ... APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF BIHAR TH: VIGILANCE ... RESPONDENT(S)

WITH CRL.A.NO. 614 OF 2011

(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P.(CRL.)NO.697/2011)

O R D E R

Leave granted.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

It is not disputed that the appellant in each case is in jail from November, 2009. On consideration of the totality of the facts and circumstances of these cases, we deem it appropriate to release the appellant in each case on bail on furnishing personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

However, in the facts and circumstances of these cases, we direct the Trial Court to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible and the Trial Court would not grant any adjournments unless it becomes absolutely imperative.

With this observation, the appeals are disposed of.

...................J. (DALVEER BHANDARI)

...................J. (DEEPAK VERMA)

NEW DELHI;

28TH FEBRUARY, 2011